Monday, 14 May 2012

MIND VS MONKEY?
HAVE YOU FELT PROBLEM IN TAKING DECISION?
 SOME ONE WOULD PROUDLY ANNOUNCE
HIS EXTRA ORDINARY ABILITY TO TAKE INSTANT DECISIONS.
SOME OTHERS MAY LAMENT ON THEIR INABILITY
TO TAKE DECISION FOR EVEN SIMPLE ISSUES.
HE MIGHT BE EVEN ENVIOUS
TO THE FORMER PSEUDO CLAIMENTS.
IT IS USUALLY PRONOUNCED BY THE PALMIST
TO THEIR CLIENTS ABOUT THEIR FLUCTUATING DECISION.
HE KNOWS ALL THE MEN ARE POOR IN TAKING FINAL WORDS.
THERE IS NO MEN COMPETENT TO TAKE DECISION
FOR ALL COMPLICATED ISSUES.
IF SUCH A MAN WAS THERE,
THERE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN THE DISPUTE BETWEEN
MEN, RELIGIONS, POLITICAL PARTIES AND EVEN NATIONS.
ATLEAST FOR PLANNING OUR OWN LIFE STYLE,
 DECISION MAKING IS NOT THAT EASY.
IS IT SO EASY TO GO AHEAD
WITH A METICULOUS DECISION
TAKEN AFTER A SERIES OF CONTEMPLATIONS,
FOR A TARGETTED PERIOD? 
NO.
NOT AT ALL.
I FEEL MYSELF PROBLEMS TO PRACTICE MY NARRATIONS IN THE ESSAYS SCRIBBLED UNDER THE
CAPTION“HIGH SOUNDING PHILOSOPHY”
HERE IS THE PROBLEM WITH THE MONKEY.
IT ALWAYS JUMPS FROM BRANCHES TO BRANCHES.      RIGHT?




DO THE THINGS AT THE RIGHT TIME.

Do you feel a loser’s complex.
What have you lost, money, position or piece?
Have you not acted at the right time, still you could have?
Agreed. The loss accrued is painful.
Now you are finding fault with you for your lethargy.
If the action required was beyond your control, did you get disappointed?
Possibly you may not.
You feel that not as a loss; but the destiny, the doom.
Doom cannot be wiped out with an eraser.
It is to be slowly accommodated.
What is actually  the‘loss’?
It is the loss of the complacency I feel the actual loss.
It is caused by the continuous thought on loss.
Ponder over the ‘loss’ will make one a continued loser.
A loser of mental piece can never been a gainer.

COMPLACENCY IS THE ONLY THING TO BE KEPT IN SAFTY WITH OUT BEING LOST.

LIFE ARTISTS






In the married life,
Husband and wife are the actors.
o
The relatives are the playbacks.
They can give effects, sounds and shades.
Involvement of them can glorify the drama.
o
They can also defeat the play if the artists in the stage are poor thespians.
o
The play is to be completed by the actors,
Even if the playbacks are poor performers.
The success of the drama is with the actors.
Spectators attribute success and failure in them.
                           O
THEY CAN OPT EITHER AS ARTIST OR ARTISTE!
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO


“I” FEELING.

WHO IS ‘I”?
Oh! It is grammatically wrong, it is to be rewritten as ‘Who am I?’
But here I see ‘I’ as an object or a material, instead of an individual.
Individual should have the quality of individuality and personality.
Material objects are devoid of such specifications.
People with ‘I’ feeling need not have such quality.
Yes, they are materials with flesh and blood, not with soul.
I over heard, slightly heard and loudly heard,
people pronouncing this lovely pronoun prolifically and profoundly.
I rather call them a sham, an egotic or a platitudinarian.
As others, I too evaded such self-boasting ones.
I too propagated on them as nuisance and pernicious ones.
I blamed them with phrases like ‘blowing their own trumpets’.
I did not see what actually others are, other than my prejudices.
I did not see what actually am I, other than my misconceptions.
I need a spectacle to see others clearly and a mirror to see my self.
It is about you and me.
See, how many times it came in this passage the pronoun ‘I’?
That is the influence of I. That is the power of I.
We all are sham, egotic and platitudinarian at many times.
But finding fault with others is as sweet as chewing a bubble gum.
Here comes the answer to my question paused in the first line.
“I” is a dangerous term, which glitters and darkens us at times.

MY EYE SIGHT IS BLURRED; I NEED A SPECTACLE TO SEE others CLEARLY.
MY FACE IS NOT GOOD TO SEE, I WANT A MIRROR TO CLEAR MY IMAGE.




WHY GOD IS GREATER THAN GOVERNMENT?

My son, when he was in the age of 7, asked me “Who is more powerful, God or Government?” I was confused. Later I got the answer that I conveyed to him.



Everyone feel our self great and powerful.
In our casual talks too, often the projected word is “I”.
I have done so. I did it. I suggested that idea… and so forth.
It is good. We should have self-confidence and self respect, if we so deserve.
I suspect, is it a desire or deserve of the mighty Leaders of the day.
Their greatness is valued in terms of their influence and ability to harm others.



“Is he playing with me, he does not know my power to end up him.
I put a spike on him. I informed his wife about his affairs.
I spoiled his career… I sent a petition against him.
I got an injunction order from the court against him constructing the Wall.
Hai   Hai.. Everything is my gain, do you know who am I.
I have the power and wisdom to side line any body.
How great am I?”



Is it a good mean of self-assessment? 
Is it good even to a Politician or a local hooligan?
How many people could you assist is the mark of your greatness.
How many could you harm is the landmark of your weakness.



People respect the God because He can save us.
People respect the Leaders because they can harm us.

IS ‘KILLING’ A CRIME?

I READ IN THE NEWS FLASH A WILD CAT DIED IN A MOTOR CRASH. IF IT WERE A POOR DOMESTIC CAT SAND WITCHED UNDER THE WHEELS, WOULD IT HAVE BEEN SO SIGNNIFICANT IN THE NEWS COLUMN?

Who loves a butcher or a slaughterer?
The image we have about them itself is something dreadful.
What is about an assassin who kills another man for some material benefit?
An executioner is viewed with suspicion.
He does the act of capital punishment for the maintenance of the justice.
Dogcatchers are doing that for the welfare of the society.
Except the assassin, all others are doing the feat as a way of life accepted by the society.
Still we have the feeling that they are doing something sinful.
The murderer also perpetrates the act as a votary but with out any jurisprudence.
Killer is looked with antipathy and aversion only.
Infact we hate them and believe that their place is the Erebus.
What about a policeman shot a wanted criminal declared at large.
How do we feel about our soldiers, who killed mass of enemy corps in an encounter?
We applaud and garland them with rewards. Right?
In this context, killing has got a divinity, exaltation and social recognition.
Killing is an action in which the life of the victim is separated from its corporeal body. Men take the life given by the God for which the killer is rewarded! Wonderful.
Mind it, he also has a family waiting for his safe return from the field.
We have every right to slaughter our domestic animal in pretext that law allows that.  
If killed a wild animal, what would be its consequence?
See the contradiction, we can kill the domestic animals, but not the domestic men.
We are forbidden to kill domestic men but allowed to kill the enemy corps.
What is the biological difference between the wild animal and domestic ones?
Or what is the social distinction between the ‘flesh and blood’ of our men and their men.
Is killing a crime?
Is killing not a crime?
I am really confused.
Can you give a descriptive answer?
100% EXPORT ORIENTED CHILDREN!

Are we seeking for an export-oriented education to our children?

Aren’t we committing sin to our posterity on pretext of our foresight for their bright future?

I
s it commodities, to export to States or to Europe, our children? Yes, it is to you, and also to me I pause this unpleasant question. We can flatly deny the statement but the purport of the same cannot be ruled out.

We all are competitively in preparedness our wards to suit the demand of the Westerners. Starting from the very beginning, we like to impart international syllabus to make them suited for placement at the end of the course. We are in chase for getting admission in colleges with scope for campus selection to foreign agencies! Who knows not the need for qualifying the TOFLE and IELTS?

It has become a concept that wise parents would not let their children to live in India, even if they aspire so. We want to exile them at once: Right? We want to make our stuff up to international export demand. It is proud of the parents to claim that their wards are settled in USA, earning hundred thousand Dollars per month, yet not visited them for the last five years. If they married a western spouse, it matters another merit. They find it pleasure to sacrifice the affectionate one to their family, caliber one to the Nation and the tension free safe village life to the poor children. Destined to renounce the good fortunes of his motherland! Initially the child also may feel a thrill in the money winning game abroad, but later he feels the depth of the missing in life.

His affectionate parents, bosom friends, land scapes with sweet memories, loving fruit trees and pet animals, the fragrance of rain wet soil- the loses will make him disoriented and frustrated with nostalgia in later years. Some of his fortunate friends, rowing on a low income job in the village it self, living with parents, relatives, enjoying the gift of the unadulterated serenity of nature, would be at lower comparison in the early days, but later he would be envious on their non mechanical life. The festivals in the local shrines, its get-together, bathing in the country bath place… all these will become matter of sighs in his mind. Should we allow our children to abandon the divine gifts of our country, our state, and our village, just for the mad money hunt?


BE RATIONAL TO BECOME BIG

What one needs to shine in life?
To shine in life, one should either be great or big.
Of course it depends on his personality, intelligence and so forth.
We often predict on others future prospect like this…
“You have a handsome look- you are apt for a film star”.
“You are intelligent- Yes, your place is in the Civil service”
“You have athletic proficiency –you become an Olympian”.

You can become great in your field, if you have efficiency and fortune but it is not that easy for you to become big.

Politicians want to become big-big only- not great.
To become big, one should have the power of Rationality.
It is not wisdom, knowledge but the Rationality they have in special.
He should have the rationality to foresee the changes.
He should have the foresight to find suitable accommodation.

Learn from the basics………..
How to get a seat in the bus?
How to find a seat in a feast?
Be rational; you will get seat, in the Bus, in the Feast and where not?
BE RATIONALIST TO BECOME BIG.



BLAMING GAME


Blaming others flaws and flops is a time passing game to many of us. I was asked, what I was doing in the leisure hours. My reply was, “chatting with my friends”. If the other was not satisfied in my reply and curious to know about the subject of our chat, and I was open minded to him, what would have been the answer? It is sure as death; ‘the matter was a gossip on some one’. If there is no serious subject for debate, the subject intruded would often be gossip. Irrespective of the cast, creed, culture and the position of the person, it is an interesting subject to discuss, ‘blaming others’. It can be harmful and harmless like the bite of a rat snake or a cobra. Many of the incidents we gossip to others would be true facts, but we unnecessarily but deliberately emphasize them with a tone of hyperbole. No gossip is absolutely false, they are spiced half-truths. They might be truths that one should not have disclosed to avoid unnecessary propaganda. Flashing of the news might impair the good name of somebody. On disclosing, the orator gets a feeling of contention. An unknown mitigation, feelings of unloading a heavy head load! All the gossipers are not the foes of the subject of tarnishment; probably he would be a well-wisher too!


Do you know the wonderful miracle that the news of a gossip one conveyed to another, would reach to the ears of the subject under reference, within no time, that too with an added spice, however trust worthy he was. Don’t boggle; it is a true fact, haven’t you felt so.